Herpes is more common than most people realize, and far less talked about than it should be.
Across the globe, herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections are astonishingly prevalent. In the United States alone, over one in six people between the ages of 14 and 49 carry HSV-2, the strain most often associated with genital herpes. Yet, more than 80% of those infected don’t even know they have it. That’s not just a medical statistic. It reflects a deeper issue about how we discuss, understand, and manage sexual health.
Globally, HSV-2 remains the leading cause of genital ulcers, especially in high-risk populations such as sex workers and individuals living with HIV. A 2024 review found that prevalence rates in these groups can reach up to 31.7%, highlighting the stark disparities in who carries the greatest burden. Still, the belief that herpes only affects certain “types” of people is a damaging misconception.
Despite its reach, herpes remains largely invisible in public conversations. It rarely shows up in everyday discussions, sex education programs, or even routine STI screenings. Many people only begin to learn about HSV when they’re diagnosed, often in moments marked by anxiety and confusion. This disconnect between how common herpes is and how little it is talked about helps sustain a cycle of silence, misinformation, and stigma.
Part of the difficulty lies in how herpes is transmitted. The virus often spreads without any visible symptoms. Nearly 90% of transmissions happen during periods when the infected person shows no signs at all. And when symptoms do appear, they can be mistaken for other conditions—pimples, ingrown hairs, or even mild irritation—leading to frequent misdiagnosis or no diagnosis at all.
Understanding is often partial at best. In one study involving more than 2,000 people, researchers found that while 89% had heard of oral herpes, only 45% believed they had ever experienced it. This suggests that public awareness is skewed and incomplete, shaped more by myths and assumptions than by accurate herpes transmission facts.
The emotional impact of a herpes diagnosis can be intense. Even though the condition is manageable and usually does not pose long-term health risks, the stigma surrounding it can feel overwhelming. Many people delay disclosure to partners or avoid relationships altogether, not because of the virus itself, but because of how they believe others will react.
That stigma has consequences. It interferes with prevention efforts, silences honest conversation, and keeps many from getting tested. When herpes is treated as something shameful or rare, people lose access to information, support, and care.
This post is here to change that. We’ll break down what the data actually shows, examine why so many people remain unaware of their status, and challenge the stereotypes about who gets herpes. Through real facts and a compassionate lens, we hope to foster a conversation that replaces shame with understanding. Herpes is part of many people’s lives. It’s time we talked about it like we talk about anything else that matters—with honesty, accuracy, and care.
The Numbers: Global and Local Prevalence
Herpes is not rare. It is a widespread and often misunderstood part of global public health. When both HSV-1 and HSV-2 are considered, the scale of infection becomes hard to ignore. Yet, due to limited symptoms and frequent misdiagnosis, the full scope of herpes remains largely hidden from public view.
In 2016, researchers estimated that approximately 3.75 billion people under the age of 50 were infected with HSV-1. That accounts for nearly two-thirds of the global population in that age group. While HSV-1 is commonly associated with cold sores, it is also a major cause of genital herpes. This is especially true among younger people in wealthier countries, where oral herpes is often acquired later in life and can be transmitted during oral-genital contact. In regions such as Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Western Pacific, HSV-1 is typically passed on during childhood, often through everyday interactions like sharing food or close contact within families.
HSV-2, which is more strongly associated with genital herpes, affects fewer people overall but still represents a major public health concern. As of 2020, an estimated 519 million people aged 15 to 49 were living with HSV-2, representing roughly 13% of that global age group. The burden is not evenly distributed. Women are more likely to contract HSV-2 than men, largely due to biological differences that increase transmission efficiency. In the United States, African American women are particularly affected, with some studies reporting prevalence rates as high as 48%.
In North America, around half of all adults are believed to carry HSV-1, with most infections resulting from oral contact during childhood. HSV-2 affects roughly one in six people aged 14 to 49. These figures reflect the virus’s broad reach across age groups, backgrounds, and lifestyles. Herpes is not confined to any one demographic. It affects people in long-term relationships, those with few partners, and individuals who may never suspect they are carrying the virus.
Despite these high numbers, awareness remains low. Up to 87% of people with HSV-2 are unaware of their status. This is often because symptoms are mild or absent altogether. Many people experience irritation, itching, or small sores but assume they are caused by something else, such as an ingrown hair or a yeast infection. Another important factor is asymptomatic shedding. This occurs when the virus is active on the skin even though there are no visible signs, allowing it to spread unknowingly.
The lack of visible symptoms and general misunderstanding about transmission have serious consequences. They contribute to continued spread, delay diagnosis, and reinforce stigma. When people are not informed about how common herpes is or how it can be transmitted, they are less likely to seek testing, discuss it with partners, or recognize symptoms in themselves.
Understanding the numbers is not just about statistics. It is about starting a more open and informed conversation. These facts show that herpes is not an outlier or a rarity. It is a common part of many people’s lives, often silent, but no less significant because of that.
Why Don’t People Realize They Have It?
One of the most surprising aspects of herpes is how many people who carry the virus have no idea they are infected. This is not due to negligence or denial. It stems from the nature of the virus itself, gaps in testing practices, and the persistent social stigma that surrounds it.
For HSV-2, the numbers are especially striking. Research shows that up to 80% of people who test positive for the virus report never having received a diagnosis. In many cases, this is because symptoms are so mild they go unnoticed. Others may mistake outbreaks for something more routine, such as a razor burn, pimple, or ingrown hair. Visually, herpes sores can closely resemble these everyday skin issues, which makes it easy for both patients and providers to misidentify them.
Even those who never show symptoms at all can still spread the virus. Asymptomatic shedding is a well-documented phenomenon, occurring on roughly 10% of days in people who experience no visible signs of infection. This makes it entirely possible to transmit herpes without realizing there is anything to disclose or treat. The result is a virus that often passes quietly from one person to another, unnoticed and unspoken.
The problem is compounded by the way herpes is treated in clinical settings. Unlike other sexually transmitted infections, herpes is often excluded from routine STI panels. There are several reasons for this. Testing can be expensive and sometimes inconclusive, particularly for people who are not showing symptoms. There are also concerns about the psychological impact of a positive diagnosis when there is no cure and limited clinical benefit to knowing one’s status if asymptomatic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not recommend routine screening for HSV in individuals without symptoms or high-risk factors.
Even when someone tests positive, the result may not always lead to open discussion or clinical guidance. Some healthcare providers are hesitant to disclose a diagnosis or recommend testing because treatment protocols are not always clear. They may worry about causing unnecessary distress or may feel unsure about how to frame the diagnosis in a supportive way. This hesitation can leave patients in the dark about their condition and its implications.
Beyond the clinic, stigma plays a powerful role in maintaining silence. Herpes continues to carry a heavy social burden, which discourages open conversation, even among romantic partners. People living with HSV often report struggling to share their status, fearing judgment, rejection, or shame. This reluctance can delay disclosure or prevent it altogether, keeping the virus hidden in both personal relationships and public discourse.
Media portrayals and cultural narratives often contribute to this silence. Herpes is frequently depicted as a punchline or as something shameful, which reinforces harmful beliefs and internalized stigma. While some public awareness campaigns have aimed to shift this perception, their impact has been mixed. Education alone is not always enough. Addressing stigma requires empathy, nuance, and the willingness to talk about herpes in ways that are accurate and emotionally supportive.
When people don’t realize they have herpes, it is rarely because they are ignoring the facts. More often, it reflects how symptoms present, how rarely testing is offered, and how difficult it is to speak openly about a condition so frequently misunderstood. Awareness starts by acknowledging these barriers and working to remove them, one conversation at a time.
The Misleading Image of Who “Gets” Herpes
Herpes is often burdened not only by medical misunderstanding but also by moral judgment. Many people continue to associate the virus with promiscuity or “irresponsible” behavior, despite overwhelming evidence that it affects people across all walks of life. These assumptions are not only false; they are harmful. They shape how people respond to a diagnosis and discourage open discussion, even with healthcare providers or loved ones.
Stigma around herpes has deep roots in cultural narratives that link sexual health to personal worth. Research shows that many people judge those with herpes more harshly than those with other common infections. This judgment often stems from the incorrect belief that contracting herpes is a result of carelessness or high-risk choices. In reality, the virus spreads widely across different populations, including those with low numbers of sexual partners. HSV-2 is commonly found even among individuals who report long-term monogamous relationships or only a single lifetime partner.
The science is clear: herpes does not discriminate. Anyone who is sexually active can contract it, and many people are exposed to the virus without ever realizing it. Transmission can happen in relationships where one partner is unaware they carry the virus. Since herpes can be passed even when no symptoms are present, someone can unknowingly transmit it after years of not showing any outward signs. This is particularly true of HSV-2, which often remains hidden until a routine test or unexpected outbreak reveals it.
Herpes is also not limited to adult sexual contact. HSV-1, the strain most often associated with oral cold sores, is commonly passed from adult to child through simple, everyday interactions. A child might contract the virus by sharing utensils, being kissed by a relative, or touching a surface with the virus present. These nonsexual forms of transmission are widespread and often go unnoticed, yet they challenge the idea that herpes is always linked to sexual behavior.
The assumption that herpes only affects people with “risky” lifestyles overlooks the true nature of the virus and the way it spreads. It also contributes to isolation and shame, making it harder for people to seek support or talk about their diagnosis. This can delay treatment, hinder disclosure, and perpetuate myths that keep accurate information out of reach.
Understanding who gets herpes is not just about correcting statistics. It is about challenging the stigma that surrounds this condition and replacing it with empathy and facts. Herpes is not a reflection of character or choices. It is a common, often silent virus that can affect anyone. The sooner we dismantle the stereotypes, the sooner we can create space for honest, informed conversations that prioritize health, dignity, and support.
The Harm of Underestimating Its Prevalence
Failing to grasp how widespread herpes truly is creates more than just confusion. It discourages people from seeking testing, keeps them unaware of their own risk, and deepens the stigma surrounding the diagnosis. When herpes is viewed as rare or only affecting a certain type of person, it becomes harder for those living with it to access support and accurate information.
Many people avoid getting tested not because they do not care about their health, but because they fear the judgment that might follow. The stigma attached to genital herpes has a chilling effect on healthcare behavior. People may hesitate to speak openly with providers, worry about being labeled, or dismiss mild symptoms altogether. Some even choose to deny or conceal signs of infection, unsure how to navigate a conversation that feels shame-laden before it begins.
Compounding the problem is the lack of public understanding about how herpes spreads. Because HSV often transmits silently, people who do not have symptoms assume they are not at risk. Public health messages often fail to make clear that herpes can be passed on during periods when there are no visible signs. As a result, individuals who believe they are in low-risk situations may never think to ask for testing or consider the possibility of infection.
When a diagnosis does happen, the emotional fallout can be intense. For someone who has never seen themselves as vulnerable to an STI, the news can be disorienting. People often react with disbelief, wondering how this could happen to them. This shock is made worse by cultural messages that frame herpes as a consequence of recklessness or moral failing. Even when someone knows better intellectually, the emotional impact can still be heavy. Shame, fear, and self-blame often follow.
This emotional toll does not stay private. It reaches into relationships and self-image. Some people avoid dating altogether after learning they have herpes. Others enter new relationships carrying anxiety about disclosure or the fear of rejection. Concerns about passing the virus to a partner may create distance, even when relationships are otherwise strong. Over time, the stress can lead to loneliness, social withdrawal, or symptoms of depression and anxiety.
Studies consistently show that genital herpes can negatively affect mental health and relationship satisfaction, especially in environments where stigma remains high. It is not the virus itself that causes this distress, but rather the silence and misunderstanding that surround it. When people are left to navigate herpes alone, without community or clear information, the weight of the diagnosis becomes harder to carry.
Underestimating herpes is not just a statistical oversight. It shapes how people seek care, how they view themselves, and how they relate to others. Breaking this pattern begins with acknowledging the reality of the virus, not just in numbers but in lived experience. When we treat herpes as a common part of human health, we make space for more honest conversations and more compassionate responses.
Why Awareness Helps Everyone, Not Just Those Diagnosed
Raising awareness about herpes does more than support those with a diagnosis. It fosters a healthier, more informed culture around sexual health for everyone. When public conversations are grounded in accurate information rather than stigma, the effects ripple through relationships, media, and healthcare settings alike.
One of the most immediate benefits of awareness is the reduction of misinformation and shame. Misconceptions about herpes, particularly the idea that it reflects irresponsibility or personal failure, often lead people to suffer in silence. These false beliefs discourage open dialogue and perpetuate cycles of fear. When people are empowered to talk honestly about sexual health, stigma begins to lose its grip. Studies have shown that public messaging works best when it balances emotional tone with clarity, allowing humor or empathy to connect without minimizing the facts. National education efforts, like those led by the NZ Herpes Foundation, have demonstrated that community-centered health communication, training, and support can significantly reduce social stigma.
Greater awareness also opens the door to more meaningful conversations about sexual health. When people have the language and confidence to discuss herpes and other infections, they are better equipped to advocate for themselves and their partners. This kind of communication builds trust and can be especially powerful in communities that have been historically excluded from mainstream sexual health education. Tailoring messages to reflect cultural context has been shown to make sexual health information more relatable, respectful, and actionable. Whether in classrooms, clinics, or casual conversations, education that feels relevant encourages people to ask questions and seek answers.
Informed awareness does more than shift attitudes. It shapes behavior. People who have access to accurate, supportive information are more likely to get tested, disclose their status, and take steps to protect themselves and their partners. Education programs that offer group learning, peer support, or interactive tools have been shown to reduce depressive symptoms and increase safe practices, including condom use. In many cases, the simple act of learning that herpes is common and manageable can relieve anxiety and replace fear with clarity.
Community health programs and emerging technologies also play a key role. Mobile apps, educational games, and online resources make information more accessible, especially for younger audiences. These tools encourage engagement without judgment and can promote long-term changes in behavior. At their best, they help individuals feel not only more informed, but more in control of their health choices.
Awareness is not just about statistics or public service announcements. It is about creating a cultural shift that values honesty, respect, and compassion in conversations about sexual health. When herpes is understood as a shared public health issue rather than a source of shame, the benefits extend far beyond any single diagnosis. Everyone gains from a world where people feel free to speak, learn, and care for one another without fear.
What You Can Do to Normalize the Conversation
Changing how we talk about herpes begins with everyday actions. While large-scale education efforts play an important role, individual conversations can be just as powerful. By using accurate language, challenging misinformation, and speaking openly when appropriate, each person can contribute to a culture where herpes is understood rather than feared.
One of the most impactful steps is to use precise and respectful terminology. Saying “HSV-1” instead of “cold sore virus,” or referring to herpes as a virus rather than a moral failure, helps shift the tone from judgment to understanding. Language shapes perception, and when we speak about sexually transmitted infections with the same neutrality we give other health conditions, we remove unnecessary shame. This is true in both clinical and personal settings. Using clear, non-stigmatizing words allows people to hear information more openly and speak about their experiences without feeling labeled.
When myths or casual misinformation arise in conversation, it helps to gently introduce facts. For example, if someone claims herpes only affects people who are “promiscuous,” sharing data on the global prevalence of HSV-1 and HSV-2 across all demographics can reframe the discussion. Directing people to accessible, science-based resources also makes a difference. Tools like educational apps, reputable health websites, and conversational agents designed for sexual health disclosure are becoming valuable ways to spread accurate information and reduce confusion.
Being open about herpes, when it feels safe and appropriate, is another way to shift the narrative. Honest communication with partners builds trust and supports informed decision-making. Talking with friends or family about the realities of the virus can also help break the cycle of silence. These conversations do not need to be dramatic or deeply personal to be effective. Even small moments of clarity or compassion can chip away at the stigma.
Advocacy can also happen on a broader scale. Supporting comprehensive sex education that includes emotional and social dimensions, not just biological facts, is essential. Many people learn little or nothing about herpes in school or from their healthcare providers. This gap leaves space for fear to grow. Campaigns that treat herpes as part of the normal landscape of sexual health—especially those tailored for adolescents and young adults—can reduce shame and improve communication skills before misinformation takes hold.
Normalizing the conversation does not require perfection or expertise. It starts with willingness. When people use their voices to clarify, support, or simply listen, they make it easier for others to speak. Bit by bit, this creates a more honest and supportive environment—one where people can face a diagnosis without fear, ask questions without embarrassment, and live their lives without carrying an unnecessary burden of silence.
Let’s Keep the Conversation Going
Herpes is a part of life for millions of people, yet it continues to be surrounded by silence, confusion, and shame. That silence serves no one. As we’ve seen, herpes is incredibly common, often misunderstood, and far more about biology than behavior. Whether someone is diagnosed or not, understanding the reality of herpes helps all of us build a healthier, more informed culture—one where people feel seen, supported, and equipped to care for themselves and their relationships.
Awareness is not just about knowing the facts. It’s about compassion. It means recognizing that no one should feel alone because of a diagnosis, and that open, accurate conversations can make a powerful difference. Every time we choose clear language over euphemism, science over myth, and empathy over judgment, we help move the conversation toward truth.
If this article resonated with you or helped clarify something you’ve wondered about, we’d love to stay connected. Join our mailing list to get updates on new articles, practical tools, and thoughtful resources designed to support you and the people you care about.
References
Bennett, C., Rebafka, A., Carrier, J., Cook, S., & Edwards, D. (2022). Impact of primary and recurrent genital herpes on the quality of life of young people and adults: a mixed methods systematic review. JBI evidence synthesis, 20(6), 1406–1473.
Bhattacharya, P., Al-slaity, A., & Orji, R. (2023). Persuasive application for sex education. 2023 IEEE 11th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 1–7.
Bickford, J., Barton, S. E., & Mandalia, S. (2007). Chronic genital herpes and disclosure…. The influence of stigma. International journal of STD & AIDS, 18(9), 589–592.
Bobrow, M. (2016). Full Disclosure: Herpes Stigma and Communication Practices among HSV+ Individuals.
Corey, L., & Mertz, G. (1985). Concepts in the Development of Vaccines Against Genital Herpes Simplex Virus Infections.
Ebel, C., & Rosenthal, S. (2004). A Clearer Perspective on Genital Herpes Stigma. Herpes: The Journal of the IHMF, 11(1), 3.
Fatahzadeh, M., & Schwartz, R. (2007). Human herpes simplex virus infections: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, symptomatology, diagnosis, and management. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(5), 737-763.
Fleming, D. T., McQuillan, G. M., Johnson, R. E., Nahmias, A. J., Aral, S. O., Lee, F. K., & St Louis, M. E. (1997). Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. The New England journal of medicine, 337(16), 1105–1111.
Fortenberry, J. D. (2004). The effects of stigma on genital herpes care-seeking behaviours. Herpes, 11(1), 8–11.
Gray, C., Crawford, G., Roberts, M., & Vujcich, D. (2024). ‘You are making it sound like you are talking to a child’: Exploring community sentiment on developing and disseminating tailored sexual health education resources for migrants. Health Education Research.
Harfouche, M., AlMukdad, S., Alareeki, A., Osman, A.M., Gottlieb, S., Rowley, J., Abu-Raddad, L.J., & Looker, K.J. (2024). Estimated global and regional incidence and prevalence of herpes simplex virus infections and genital ulcer disease in 2020: mathematical modelling analyses. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 101.
Hurst, C. (1996). A tripartite approach: patients, health and medical professionals combine to improve public and medical information and education about genital herpes.
James, C. R., Harfouche, M., Welton, N., Turner, K., Abu-Raddad, L., Gottlieb, S., & Looker, K. (2020). Herpes simplex virus: global infection prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98, 315–329.
Johnston C. (2022). Diagnosis and Management of Genital Herpes: Key Questions and Review of the Evidence for the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 74(Suppl_2), S134–S143.
Keene, L. C., & Boyd, D. T. (2021). Ending the epidemic: Assessing sexual health communication, personal agency, and HIV stigma among Black and Latino youth in the U.S. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18.
Khatimah, H., Astuti, I., Puspita, E., & Fitria, D. (2025). Sexual Education Interventions in Schools: A Key to Preventing STIs/HIV. International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health.
Koelle, D. M., & Wald, A. (2000). Herpes simplex virus: the importance of asymptomatic shedding. The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 45(Suppl T3), 1–8.
Koren, M., & Decker, C. F. (2016). Genital herpes. Disease-a-month : DM, 62(8), 287–293.
Looker, K. J., Magaret, A. S., Turner, K. M., Vickerman, P., Gottlieb, S. L., & Newman, L. M. (2015). Global estimates of prevalent and incident herpes simplex virus type 1 infections in 2012. PLoS One, 10(5), e0129883.
Mark, H. (2013). Asymptomatic sexually active adolescents and young adults should not be screened for herpes simplex virus. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(8), 691–692.
Miyachi M, Imamura-Ichigatani T, Ihara H, et al. Herpes simplex virus DNA testing by a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for accurate clinical diagnosis and detection of mucosal viral shedding. The Journal of Dermatology. 2022 Feb;49(2):282-288. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.16229. PMID: 34767275.
Moreno, J., Sánchez-Anguix, V., Alberola, J. M., Julián, V., & Botti, V. (2022). A Conversational Agent for Medical Disclosure of Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Patel, R. (2004). Educational interventions and the prevention of herpes simplex virus transmission. Herpes: The Journal of the IHMF, 11(Suppl 3), 155A–160A.
Pica, F., & Volpi, A. (2012). Public awareness and knowledge of herpes labialis. Journal of Medical Virology, 84(1), 132–137.
Pliskin, K. L. (1997). Verbal intercourse and sexual communication: impediments to STD prevention. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 11(1), 89–109.
Pliskin, K.L. (2016). Communication: Impediments to STD.
Rietmeijer, C., & Low, N. (2008). Herpes Complex. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 84, 330–331.
Roberts, R. E., & Marcos, S. (2016). Media Representations of Herpes.
Shearer, L., Simmons, L., Mindel, A., Stanberry, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2012). Reducing the stigma of herpes simplex virus infection: lessons from an online video contest. Sexual Health, 9(5), 438–444.
Sheary, B., & Dayan, L. (2005). Herpes simplex virus serology in an asymptomatic patient. Australian Family Physician, 34(12), 1043–1046.
Swanson, J. M., & Chenitz, W. C. (1989). The prevention and management of genital herpes: A community health approach. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 6(4), 209–221.
Swanson, J., Dibble, S., & Chapman, L. (1999). Effects of psycho-educational interventions on sexual health risks and psycho-social adaptation in young adults with genital herpes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(4), 840–851.
Tanzola, M. B. (2010). Prevalence of Genital Herpes Pegged at 16%. Family Practice News, 40, 16-17.
Tronstein, E., Johnston, C., Huang, M.-L., Selke, S., Magaret, A., Warren, T., Corey, L., & Wald, A. (2011). Genital shedding of herpes simplex virus among symptomatic and asymptomatic persons with HSV-2 infection. JAMA, 305(14), 1441–1449.
Turner, K. (2015). S03.2 Global and regional estimates of HSV2, HSV1 and neonatal herpes for 2012. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 91.
Wang, K., Merin, A., Rendina, H. J., & Pachankis, J. E. (2018). Genital herpes stigma: Toward the Measurement and Validation of a highly prevalent yet hidden public health problem. Stigma and health, 3(1), 27–34.
Wang, Y., Yan, X., Ai, W., Jia, Y., Fan, C., Hu, S., … & Tang, W. (2024). Disparities in burden of herpes simplex virus type 2 in China. Frontiers in Immunology, 15.
Wertheimer, A., Balduzzi, M., & Minghetti, P. (1991). Reactions of community pharmacists to questions by patients with a stigmatized disease. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 16.
Witte, S., El-Bassel, N., Gilbert, L., Wu, E., & Chang, M. (2010). Lack of awareness of partner STD risk among heterosexual couples. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(1), 49–55.
